beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and fine of 20,000,000 won, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2016 Highest 6653]
1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed by the Defendants is a person operating a commercial sex acts business establishment with the trade name “H”. Defendant B is a head of the office in charge of guiding male customers to an officetel in which male customers are waiting for commercial sex acts and handling them under the name of a man. Defendant C is a head of the office in charge of guiding male customers to an officetel in which male customers are waiting for commercial sex acts. Defendant D and Defendant E are responsible for managing officetels cleaning and fixtures at the said commercial sex acts establishment and providing guidance to an officetel in which male customers are waiting for commercial sex acts. Defendant D and Defendant E are responsible for the role of viewing the network in preparation for police crackdowns around the above commercial sex acts establishment.
The Defendants together from April 11, 2016 to May 24, 2016 (Provided, That from May 12, 2016 to May 24, 2016, Defendant C, from May 17, 2016 to May 24, 2016, Defendant C, from May 17, 2016 to May 24, 2016, Defendant C, from May 201 to May 24, 2016, Defendant C, from May 22, 2016 to Defendant C, from May 22, 2016 to 2016, reported Defendant C’s officetel’s 703,705,705, 105, 1005, 101, 101, 101, 101, and 101, 101, 10, 101, etc., of the instant male entertainment site.
M, N,O, and P have male customers engage in sexual intercourse with male customers by receiving KRW 70,00 or KRW 150,00 from male customers.
As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.
[2016 Highest 9502]
2. Mediation of sexual traffic by Defendant C;
A. The Defendant, as the head of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Itel Nos. 703, 705, 715, 1005, 1009, 1010, and 1012, as the head of the office of the “H” entertainment business establishment, the Defendant controlled the above business establishment around May 24, 2016 while arranging commercial sex acts with the business owner A.