(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.26 2017고단218

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.26 2017고단218

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 28, 2016, at around 20:09, the Defendant: (a) boarded the victim E (54) seated in the back seat of F-si operated under this e (54) and was at his own seat located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, a destination, G, and abused the victim’s face by putting the victim out of the main road without any special reason; (b) being drunk on the main road of Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul; and (c) being able to have the victim out of the main road without any special reason.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black boxes and video CDs;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 5-10 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes concerning the crime

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of the sentencing of the instant case on the grounds of the punishment under Article 334(1) is not easy in light of the motive of the instant crime and the risk of the occurrence of accidents resulting therefrom, and the Defendant was punished by a fine for interference with ordinary business on or around 2007. Meanwhile, the Defendant’s confession and reflects the instant crime; the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in contingency under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant case; the Defendant is deemed to have committed the instant crime in contingency under the influence of alcohol; compensation for damages to the victim; and the agreement was made in full view of all the circumstances and sentencing guidelines expressed in the record and the theory of

참조조문

-특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률 제5조의10 제1항

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2017.04.28 2016고단3707

-서울북부지방법원 2017.04.21 2016고단5175

-서울북부지방법원 2017.07.14 2017고단1288

-서울북부지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단3262

-서울북부지방법원 2017.05.26 2017고단660