A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

1. On May 1, 201, around 03:00, drinking in front of the Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Southern-gu B, and drinking in front of the victim C (V, 43 years of age) who is an employee of the defendant frequently employed;

However, on the ground that the victim refuses to do so, after leaving the victim by brushing the victim by hand, the victim left the part of the victim's leaving from the back and walking the part of the victim several times, thereby getting about about 10 weeks of treatment to the victim, and the victim left the part that requires about 10 weeks of treatment;

2. Around 01:00 on September 6, 2013, the victim living together with the defendant's house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, took away things inside the house with the noise of "the width and width is the match year, the Dominium," and the victim scambling the disturbance. The victim scamed the victim's bombs over the floor by cutting the victim's humbs, cutting the victim's humbs over the floor, and scamed the victim's humbs over the part of the part of the victim, thereby causing injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of two-day treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. The E witness statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of medical records and a certificate of injury diagnosis;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that the nature of the crime in this case is not mitigated in light of the background and mode of each crime in this case, the degree of injury to the victim, etc. Meanwhile, the defendant led to a confession and reflect of part of the crime in this case, the defendant paid damages to the victim, and the defendant agreed to do so. On May 1, 2011, immediately after the crime of self-injury on May 1, 201, the defendant was living together with the victim for several years, and the defendant did not have any particular criminal history, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the circumstances and sentencing guidelines shown in the records and the theory of changes