A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2016, around 01:35, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main duties by force over about 10 minutes, including, but not limited to, the Plaintiff’s drinking alcohol at the “E” heading “E” heading a drinking house operated by the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by throwing a sudden beer mick on the floor, throwing the beer’s disease into the bottom, leaving the beer’s disease into the bottom, and making the surrounding customers fright up the beer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he had been punished several times due to violent crimes such as interference with the suspension of the execution of official duties, etc. on or before 208, and committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the crime is not good in light of the content of the crime, such as breaking the beer balance on the floor without any reason, breaking it on the floor of the beer balance, the crime is not good after being arrested as an offender in the act of this case and being released from the investigation after being arrested as an offender and being released from the investigation to the trial by the investigation agency or the court. Meanwhile, the fact that the defendant recognized and against the crime of this case, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the fact that there was no punishment exceeding the fine other than the punishment on around 208 prior to this case, and the sentencing guidelines as set forth in the text of this case and the changes in the sentencing guidelines.