logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.12.13 2017고단784
사기등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants, the two-year period from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court on July 19, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 16, 2014. On September 25, 2014, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 25, 2014, and that judgment became final and conclusive on October 3, 2014.

After forging the real estate lease agreement, the Defendants conspired to use the money as security, and Defendant A had resided in the amount of KRW 15 million, monthly rent of KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

1. In accordance with the above public invitation as above, around November 10, 2010, Defendant A prepared in the column of the location of the real estate lease agreement form using the aforementioned D Apartment No. 103 Dong 1105, and the location of the lessor’s name “D apartment No. 103 Dong 1105, Namyang-si, Gyeonggi-do,” in the guarantee column, “Won 65,000,000” in the contract gold column, “Won 65,000,000 won shall be paid and received at the time of the contract,” “Won 1,000,000 won” in the remaining gold column, “E, 5, 209,” and “E,” and “A” in the name of the lessor and lessee column, and then the Defendant prepared to affix his seal back E in advance to E.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising.

2. On November 13, 2010, the Defendants at the event of the said investigation document presented it to H to the G multilateral bank located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, about November 13, 2010, as such, as if the above forged lease contract was genuine.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to present the above forged E-title lease contract to H for use.

3. The Defendants are the date, time, place, and victim H as described in paragraph 2.

arrow