The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months for the first crime (2017 order 4198) in the judgment of the court, and two crimes (2017 order 2027 order) in the judgment of the court.

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daegu District Court on November 8, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 16, 2013.

1. "2017 Highest 4198";

A. On March 10, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would make reimbursement by disposing of an apartment house under the name of the victim in the name of the victim C located in Seongbuk-gu, Daegu-gu, with money as business funds, in the victim C’s residence.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have apartment in the name of the defendant, and there was no other legal or legal intention to make repayment to the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20,000,000 from the account in the name of the Defendant to transfer to another account under the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 108,70,000 over 12 times as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form.

As a result, the Defendant received the victim C’s property.

B. On August 19, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents, at the same place as above, entered “I” in the gold column for the guarantee of Sucheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D Apartment E apartment site, “O million won” in the contract gold column, “Seocheon-gu Won,” “Seocheon-do Won,” “Seocheon-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul” in the name of the lessor’s address column, “H,” and “I” in the resident registration number column in the name of the Defendant arbitrarily affixed I.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant has forged one Chapter of the Real Estate Lease Contract in the name of I, a private document on rights and obligations.

(c)

(1) On August 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) issued a forged real estate lease agreement with the victim who was aware of the forgery at the victim’s residence; and (b) exercised it as if it was duly formed.

(2) On September 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) completed a real estate transaction agreement in the name of J, which was forged to the victim who was unaware of the forgery at the same place.