logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.02.06 2013고단2546
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum term of one year and six months, for a short term of one year, and for a term of eight months, respectively.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 2546"

1. On March 24, 2013, Defendant A posted an article to the effect that Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct would sell a double-high sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick in the Internet’s residence located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and said, Defendant A said that he would deposit KRW 120,000 to the victim G who made contact with it, and send the sick sick sick sick sicks to his home.

However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to send the saves as promised even if he did not own the saves and saves in selling the saves to the victim and received the proceeds from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 120,00 from a single bank account (H) in the name of the Defendant from the victim, and by July 3, 2013, by deceiving the victims to sell valuable goods on 26 occasions, as shown in the attached crime list 1, and by deceiving the victims to deposit KRW 6,484,50 in total from the victims.

2. The Defendants’ co-principal posted an article on the Internet NAV “China” car page and other used goods, and conspired to take advantage of the fact that they sell used goods such as clothes, etc., and then receive the proceeds from the contact victims and distribute them.

As a result, on April 6, 2013, the Defendants posted a letter to the effect that “assumpter’s pocket tickets are sold” on the Internet NAVVV in the Defendant’s residence located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and said that they would deposit KRW 330,000 to the victim I who made contact with it, and then send the Baber’s pocket tickets at home.

However, the Defendants did not have an intention or ability to send a sicker’s pocket ticket as promised even if they did not own a sicker’s pocket ticket for sale to the victim and received a payment from the victim.

The Defendant is identical to this.

arrow