A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny and intrusion upon residence;

A. On July 22, 2017, around July 22, 2017, the Defendant opened the front door of the victim’s residence located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and intrudes on the victim’s residence. Around July 22, 2017, the Defendant stolen the victim’s 2,000 square meters of 75,00,000, total market value of the victim’s ownership located in the new site of the new site, and 1,000 square meters of sand.

B. On July 30, 2017, around July 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim’s residential gate in front of the victim’s residence in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) intruded the victim’s residential gate; and (c) brought about a theft of female clothing, such as b19,00 won in total, the market price of the victim’s ownership, which was suffering from the dried site as soon as possible, including flababa, flaba, and clothes

C. On August 5, 2017, around August 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the place indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 1-1 to the front of the entrance door; (b) intruded the victim B’s residence; (c) brought about a theft by taking advantage of the victim’s share of KRW 222,00,00 in total of the market price owned by the victim, which was suffering from a dried stand as soon as possible.

2. On August 9, 2017, around 20:55, the Defendant: (a) intruded the victim’s husband at night in a place indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 1; (b) and in front of the entrance and exit; (c) the victim’s market price in the front of the entrance and exit; (d) was discovered to the victim’s husband; and (e) was discovered to the victim’s husband; and (e) did not lead to an attempted attempt by means of tax calculation and exemption and reduction.

3. From the beginning of April 2017 to the end of July 2017, the Defendant taken photographs of the victims’ body by using his/her smartphone camera in the same way 30 times in total without the consent of the injured party in his/her own smartphone camera in light of the train train, etc., from the early of the beginning of April 2017 to the early of the end of July.

Accordingly, the defendant has a camera function.