logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 11. 12. 선고 2015두48709 판결
(심리불속행) 매도자의 양도가액과 매수인의 양수가액이 다른 경우 실제 매매가액[국승][실거래가액]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2014-Nu-6388 ( July 8, 2015)

Case Number of the previous trial

early trial 2013west 4472

Title

(D) If the transfer value of a seller and the acquisition value of a purchaser are different, the actual sales value [national succession]

Summary

(C) The Plaintiff’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s tax authority’s

Related statutes

Article 114 of the Income Tax Act (Determination, Revision and Notification of Tax Base for Transfer Income and Amount of Tax)

Cases

Supreme Court-2015-Du-48709 ( November 12, 2015)

Plaintiff

Park*

Defendant

*The Director of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

November 12, 2015

United States of America and the United States of America

Cases

2015Du48709 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

Park*

Defendant-Appellee

*The Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu63888 Decided July 8, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow