The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not cause any injury to the victim D, and rather, the victim F is broken down with the wind that the victim F gets back and the victim F gets down with the back head of the defendant.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, and the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court acknowledged the fact that the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim D and sponsed on the floor to the victim F and caused the victim F to be protruding, thereby having the victim F suffered the wound.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is not accepted.

① 피해자들은 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 ‘ 피고인이 술값을 지불하지 않고 나가려고 하기에 나가지 못하게 막았는데, 화분을 바닥에 던져 깼고, 바닥에 화분 파편이 튀면서 피해자 F이 다쳤다.

In order to prevent the Defendant from doing so, the Defendant consistently stated the damage caused by the victim D’s scambling, etc., and consistently stated the damage situations, and the victim’s injury injury injury injury and content as stated in each injury diagnosis submitted by the victims (as 60,61 pages of investigation records) also conforms to the above statement.

(2) The defendant has no record of assaulting the victims in an investigative agency.

The victims changed the drinking value, balp, spathing the balp, and spathing the hand by selling. The victim F made a statement that "the victim F would have recovered from the balp to the balp to the balp to the balp to the balp to the balp to the balp to the balp to the falp to the 5th trial date of the lower court." However, the victim F would have made a statement that "the part of the injury to the victim D is recognized, and the injury to the victim F would have occurred far from the balp to the balp to the body during the