The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal revealed that the Defendant’s crushing of the fire on the new crush site at the time of the instant case was a passive defensive act that prevents the victim from entering the crush and having the Defendant enter the house with a lethal weapon.

Therefore, there is no illegality that the defendant's act is a passive defense against the victim's illegal attack, which constitutes a legitimate defense or legitimate act.

2. Determination

A. On June 19, 2017, the summary of the charge is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (c) on the ground that the Victim A (75 Doh) paid a flat noise; (d) the Victim A (75 cm) brought about a fluort at the end of the fluort (10 cm in length) and carried out a fluort (85 cm in length) of the dangerous object protruding at the end of the fluort (85 cm in length) without permission; and (d) the Defendant took the Defendant into the Defendant’s dwelling without permission, with sound “the Defendant fluort, dead, fluor, etc., of the Defendant’s body, body, face, etc., and fluort with the victim’s face and fluort with the victim’s body and fluort with the victim’s body and fluort with the victim’s body.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented in the lower judgment.

(c)

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to whether there was a criminal intent of injury, the defendant is the floor of the direction where the victim was a person who suffered damage on the front gate by setting up against the defect that the victim tried to intrude into the defendant's house through the front gate.