logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2016.03.31 2015가단17988
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed to the Plaintiff KRW 5,00,000, and 5% per annum from November 11, 2015 to March 31, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendants are residents of the Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

The Plaintiff served as the Director of the Management Office of the instant apartment, and the duties of the Director of the Management Office were suspended due to the citing the Daejeon District Court's 2015Kahap144, which was filed by the residents of the instant apartment, on September 15, 2015.

B. Defendants criminal punishment 1) The Defendants were indicted by the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court for the following criminal facts and sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000,00 from the above court on August 21, 2014, and Defendant B was sentenced to a fine of KRW 300,000, respectively. (A) On July 201, 2013, the Defendants damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation to E, F, and G, etc., who are residents of the apartment complex in the instant apartment complex, on the first time in the instant apartment complex, on the ground that “the Plaintiff is a person under suspended execution due to the violation of the Election Act, whose qualification is revoked pursuant to Articles 56 and 57 of the Housing Act and will drive away from the apartment complex.”

B) around May 23, 2013, Defendant C driven the Plaintiff at the site of the apartment road repair works for the disabled in front of the instant apartment complex, etc., and Defendant C interfered with the Plaintiff’s duties by force, such as: (a) “I am going away from the house in front of the disabled in front of the instant apartment complex,” and (b) I am expressed that “I am going away only once in the house in front of the Do office, and is qualified.” (c) Defendant C took a bath at the apartment management office of this case’s apartment complex of this case as “I am in front of it, I am in front of the instant apartment site” and publicly insulting the Plaintiff by openly pointing out that I am in front of the instant apartment building of this case, “I am in front of 2013, I am in front of the instant apartment complex, I am in the management of the Plaintiff, and I am in the middle of the marriage.”

arrow