The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was the chairman of the Council for the Representatives of Apartment Residents in Osan-si.

On September 2016, the above apartment building was built by the Park Jae-ra, and the management office decided to collect the cost of KRW 35 million from the residents of the apartment as the management expenses.

The victims, including victims D, confirmed the amount of estimated construction cost, etc. against E by the head of the management office, and sought answers from E to the following: “A approximately KRW 15 million, which was reported from F, the head of the management and management office, to the cost of construction cost of KRW 16 million,” and “after the public announcement of construction tender, the result of the examination was reported to the Defendant, the president of the resident representative meeting, who is the chairperson of the resident representative meeting.”

On November 16, 2016, with the consent of the occupants of the apartment, the victim requested an audit for the viewing of the apartment. On December 2, 2016, the defendant, who was aware of the above situation, held an explanatory meeting for the construction in the second floor representative meeting of the apartment management building around December 2, 2016.

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant heard about about 50 residents of an apartment at a briefing place around 19:00, the Defendant confirmed that: (a) the damaged person was aware of all facts related to the instant Pakistan project through the managing complaint, etc. and filed a civil petition with the consent of the residents; (b) but without any verification, he/she was aware that he/she had the head of management and the head of F, as if he/she filed a civil petition by spreading false facts without any verification; and (c) that he/she did not state about the expected amount of construction in connection with the instant Pakistan repair project

After having prepared a written confirmation of the content of “the”, I read the content of the confirmation document at the venue of the briefing session as they are, refer to the victim and confirmed the F seal.

D I would take a legal measure against a false ex officio of war.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. The lower court’s judgment is based on the records.