logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2013.08.09 2013고정41
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the Dong representative of C apartment 103 in the case of public housing.

1. On August 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) did not receive money from the victim D and E, the representative of the said apartment 104 Dong building, in relation to the selection of a controlled entity, from the apartment building 104 apartment building management company; (b) on August 25, 2012, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victims by publicly pointing out false facts, by publishing the front page of the content “A” with the management company and immediately with the management entity.

2. The facts in front of the above apartment management office on September 30, 2012 are as follows: (a) the victim D has not embezzled approximately KRW 3 to 40 million, such as the Plaintiff’s sales official expenses, the market price, and the operating fees for the Dong representative; (b) however, the Defendant is suffering from approximately 3 to 40 million, such as the Defendant’s sales official expenses, the market price, and the operating fees for the Dong representative; (c) the victim F of the management office and 5-6 resident.

3. From October 10, 2012 to October 11, 2012, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts. 3. Although there was no fact that the victim D and E received money in relation to the selection of a controlled entity from the management company, the apartment management company, the apartment management company, in spite of the fact that there was no fact that the victim D and E received money in relation to the selection of the controlled entity, the apartment management company, the apartment management company, the apartment management company, the management company, and the management company, the evidence is confirmed that some core material of the C apartment council, such as multiple residents, cash, are recorded with the management company, and that the contract was concluded with the management company, the present part of the money and valuables, such as D and E, are the former owner of the apartment.

arrow