1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years;

2. The Defendant shall pay 5,600,000 won to the applicant for damages.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for habitual fraud at the Seoul Western District Court (Seoul Western District Court) and completed the execution of the sentence on October 18, 2015.

1. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant around 2015, within the victim C EXE office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-dong 2792, Jongno-gu, Jongno 2792, and returned to D, an employee of the victim, three days after lending the camera and siren to D.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not intend to return the said goods because the Defendant disposed of the pawned camera, etc. in the pawned Hall and used the price as entertainment expenses or living expenses.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received from D, from D, a sum of 5.3 million won per share of the market price owned by the victim under the pretext of lending goods; and (c) received two carmers and two carmers from D.

From that time until December 29, 2015, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, by deceiving victims on a total of six occasions, was issued KRW 22,528,00 in total at the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

2. On November 24, 2015, the Defendant within the “G” office for the operation of the Victim F in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and to H who is an employee, return to H by November 29, 2015 the Defendant “a car and siren lending to H by November 29, 2015.”

“A false representation was made.”

However, the facts are that the Defendant did not intend to return the said goods because the Defendant disposed of the pawned camera, etc. in the pawned Hall and used the price as living expenses, etc.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving H, obtained from H one copy of the market price of the victim F, which is the sum of KRW 6,50,000,000, the market price of the victim F, from H, and acquired by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against I, J, K, D, C, L, or H;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: A criminal investigation report (Attachment of suspect identification).