Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received from C the request from C to “A to sell the camera and sirens through the country or pawnpos; and (b) received from C a request from C, even though C was aware that C was a stolen stolen from the victim D, he/she kept the stolen goods by receiving a total of KRW 5.4 million of the market price of the victim’s possession from C and three car cameras until August 12, 2016.

2. Defendant A, E, and F’s joint crime committed by Defendant A and E, and E, and F knew that the said Defendant was in custody of the horses that the said Defendant was in possession of the D-owned Kameras and three Kameraszs, and they conspired to borrow money by borrowing money, which is entrusted to the said Defendant and his own property as security, with the knowledge that the said Defendant was in possession of the D-owned Kameras and the Kamerasz.

E around 18:00 on August 12, 2016, in the pawned Hall of the trade name, “I” operated by the victim H, the victim H, who was 2.303 Dong Dong-gu, Ansan-si, Seoul Metropolitan Government, whose name “I” was the victim “I will lend money to the victim if I will lend money when I will be entrusted as security because I are his father who is his father, and the money is urgently needed.”

However, in fact, the above Kameras and Carren did not own the goods owned by Defendant, E, F, or their family members, but acquired D, and Defendant, E, and F did not have any intent or ability to repay even if they borrowed money from the injured party, because they thought that they would have divided the money from the injured party.

The defendant, E, and F conspiredd the victim as above, and followed them by receiving 550,000 won in cash from the damaged person in the same place as the borrowed money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F or C;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Domestic investigation reports (the statement of KJ) and internal investigation reports (Kamera).