The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On March 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 09:00 on March 9, 2013, at a new construction site located in D in C, in the instant construction site, inflicted an injury on the victim’s left part of C, by using a single-name flag (a large quantity of pine 1,3 meters in length) used at the said construction site as a hand, on the ground that the victim E does not go in vain; and (b) making the victim’s timber 5 times and six times at the victim’s left part, thereby causing an injury on the treatment days.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts to the effect that although the defendant took the victim E, etc. as the victim's seat, there was no fact about the victim's title in each flag, and the defendant's act did not cause any injury.

However, evidence consistent with the facts charged, there is a photographic image of F and E’s each statement in the police and the victim E’s bodily injury. However, the victim E appeared as a witness in this court and made a statement that it was not consistent, and it is difficult to believe it as it is. F also appeared as a witness in this court, and made a statement to the effect that the defendant appeared at the police upon the request of the defendant to make a statement that he was at the time of his own saw, and he made a speech different from the fact, and it is difficult to believe the above police’s statement. On the other hand, the witness G stated that the victim E was a victim’s physical injury in order to punish the defendant, and H was a witness’s statement that he was a victim’s bodily injury. In full view of the facts and the facts charged as seen above, the victim’s physical injury appears to be a part of the evidence.