The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In determining facts, the Defendant did not speak “C soon,” and there was no flabbation of flabs A’s flab and flabs with hacks.

A's upper part of the A is an regardless of the defendant.

나. 법리오해 피고인이 A로부터 목졸림을 당해서 벗어나기 위해 발버둥치다가 A의 가슴 부위 살결이 빨갛게 되었고, 피고인은 A에게서 내동댕이 쳐지지 않고 A가 도망가지 못하게 하기 위하여 A의 벨트를 잡고 있었을 뿐이다.

The defendant's act constitutes self-defense.

2. According to the following facts and circumstances admitted by the lower court based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant sufficiently recognized the fact that the Defendant committed a flag by breaking the victim’s blag with a blag with a blag and blag with a blag with a blag, as stated in the lower judgment.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

① 피고인은 자신의 행위로 인하여 A의 가슴 부위의 살이 빨갛게 된 것은 인정하는데, 폭행 부위 사진에 따르면 목 부분의 빨갛게 된 살결 한 가운데 손톱에 긁힌 듯 한 상처가 나 있다.

② The witness D of the lower court stated that at the time when the Defendant and the victim’s fighting were fighting, the victim was in distressed.

③ Considering the above point, it is reasonable to view that the victim’s neck was caused by the Defendant’s act and, in particular, the victim’s act of breathing.

④ The Defendant voluntarily admitted the victim’s Belgium, and the lower court’s witness D stated to the effect that the Defendant and the victim were wraped.

3. As seen in the judgment of the misapprehension of legal principles, as seen earlier, the Defendant took flabbbling the victim’s flab and carried flab with a flab, thereby fighting the Defendant and the victim.