logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.10.25 2011고정777
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입) 등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant:

A. On September 11, 2010, at around 11:20, around September 11, 2010, the victim E (the 37-7 years of age, women) of the D Building No. 146-702 in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si knew that the Defendant’s husband F is the Defendant’s husband, and was able to find out the transit site, and the above victim E, which was emitted from the bee house during the waiting time before the entrance, was pushed down and intruded into the said female’s residence.

B. When the victim E was removed from the floor and the face was removed from the floor at the time and place above, the victim’s injury was inflicted on the 14-day scambling of the face, the scambling of the hand part, the scambling of the hand part, and the scambling of the part below the arms whose detailed whereabouts are unknown.

C. On September 11, 2010, around 12:30 on September 12: 201, 2010, the part of the victim FF (the 46-year old, South) from the street in the Young-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, with his hand knife, was shakened, and the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife for 14 days,

2. In the judgment case, the Defendant got from the police to the police upon permission of the E, and the Defendant went to his house with the permission of the E, and there was only a fact that the police officer, in the front of the police officer, she did not commit any violence or injury, and stated that he did not commit any assault or injury, and there is only a statement at the F and the E police station as evidence to acknowledge each of the facts charged of the instant case.

However, during the trial process of this case, F and E were adopted as a witness, and around 18 times the summons of a witness was sent to each residence, but there was no response to F's detection of the police officer's location, and E was threatened by the defendant while being sent only one call during the telephone service, and is living in other areas.

arrow