(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고정2577

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고정2577

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a non-permanent person who resides in the above residence, and the victim C (23 tax, South Korea) is a group of gatherings who meet with the friendship of the Gyeonggiwon area.

On July 2, 2017, around 03:00, the Defendant heard the phrase “influence” from the second floor of “E penta” located in Yanwon-gun, Gangwon-do, to drink with one another, and “influence,” from the injured party,” and “influence,” and “influence, four refusals, four are influences.”

In other words, while doing a dispute, the victim's timber and dubage was pushed and pushed down with his left hand.

As a result, the Defendant had the victim inflict an injury on the victim, such as a dysium, light salt, etc., which requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to F or C by the police;

1. A criminal investigation report (related to hearing of the on-site conditions of witnesses G) and a criminal investigation report (related to hearing of the on-site conditions of a witness H);

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that (C) the injury diagnosis certificate (the defendant satise) (the defendant satise, at the time, had the mother and the child of the defendant first, and the victim was generated in the course of pushing the victim to defend him, and constitutes a flive or legitimate act without the intention of injury.

However, circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., ① the victim was under the influence of alcohol at the investigative agency, and the defendant was under the influence of the Defendant’s body and was under the influence of the Defendant’s desire, and the Defendant was under the influence of the Defendant’s body. Accordingly, the Defendant was flicked with the victim’s hack, and the Defendant was flicked with the victim’s hack, but the Defendant continued to flicked with the victim’s hack.

A statement, ② At the time of witnessing the scene, the investigation agency made a statement that is consistent with the victim, and was in the same manner as the victim, the victim, the F, and the scene.

In full view of G and H's statements, the victim was written by the defendant while the defendant was in conflict with the other party.

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2013.10.18 2013노476

-울산지방법원 2013.05.24 2013고정152

-제주지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고정983

-서울서부지방법원 2020.01.17 2019고정834

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.01.12 2016고합99