logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고정613
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the corporation B in Kimhae-si F, and the defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing motor vehicles and machinery parts.

It is difficult to maintain environmental standards due to water pollutants discharged from discharge facilities in the upper region of the water source protection area, special measures area and the upper region of the special measures area, areas where water intake facilities are installed, and the upper region of the water source protection area, or there is a

The Minister of Environment may not install discharge facilities that discharge specific water-quality harmful substances in an area designated as "area subject to the restriction on the installation of discharge facilities", and a person who intends to install other discharge facilities shall obtain permission from the Minister of Environment as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

1. From November 2014 to March 23, 2016, Defendant A, the Minister of Environment, from the perspective of the Ministry of Environment, set up 10 vehicles (1.205 cubic meters of water storage capacity) on the CNC line line line 10 vehicles (1.205 cubic meters of water storage capacity), even though Defendant B, designated the area as an area subject to the restriction on the installation of wastewater discharge facilities from the river basin under the river basin, was not required to obtain permission for the installation of wastewater discharge facilities, and the installation of wastewater discharge facilities was restricted by discharging specific water harmful substance more than the standard concentration.

2. Defendant B, a representative director, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same date, time, and place as in the preceding paragraph, did not obtain permission to install wastewater discharge facilities as above, and even if the installation of wastewater discharge facilities was restricted by discharging specific water-quality harmful substances more than the standard concentration, Defendant B established 10 meters of the CNC Line Line (1.205 cubic meters of water storage capacity).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying materials;

1. The relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow