Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of B corporation in Kimhae-si F, and the defendant B corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing machinery parts.

It is difficult to maintain environmental standards due to water pollutants discharged from discharge facilities in the upper region of the water source protection area, special measures area and the upper region of the special measures area, areas where water intake facilities are installed, and the upper region of the water source protection area, or there is a

The Minister of Environment may not install discharge facilities that discharge specific water-quality harmful substances in an area designated as "area subject to the restriction on the installation of discharge facilities", and a person who intends to install other discharge facilities shall obtain permission from the Minister of Environment as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

1. From around March 23, 2004 to March 23, 2016, the Defendant installed and operated the CNC nine vehicles (1.348 cubic meters of water storage capacity) and the CT five vehicles (2.08 cubic meters of water storage capacity), while Defendant F was not permitted to install wastewater discharge facilities, and the installation of wastewater discharge facilities was restricted by discharging specific water-quality hazardous substances more than the standard concentration, as between Defendant A and Defendant B, designated by the Minister of Environment as an area subject to the restriction on the installation of wastewater discharge facilities from the river basin below the river basin.

2. Defendant B, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same date, time, and place as in the preceding paragraph, set up a CNC 9 volume (1.348 cubic meters of water storage capacity) and MCR 5 volume (2.08 cubic meters of water storage capacity) without obtaining permission for installation of wastewater discharge facilities as above, even if Defendant B, a representative director, in relation to the Defendant’s business, was limited to the installation of wastewater discharge facilities by discharging specific water-quality harmful substances more than the standard concentration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1.The Acts and subordinate statutes governing each investigation report and accompanying materials;