1. The Defendant’s KRW 48,500,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from October 1, 2012 to June 24, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 2012, Defendant Company received the foregoing services again from U2S Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “U2S”), which was a part of the prior work for “C” (hereinafter “the instant project”) of Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul Guarantee Insurance”) (hereinafter “the instant consulting project”).

B. From March 2, 2012, the Plaintiff served as the chief consultant in the E Personal Information Protection Business Department, Inc., and is proceeding with the assessment of personal information impact on the F Library integrated island management system.

For the same year

4. 5. Retirement.

C. After the retirement of the above E company, the Plaintiff, as the chief consultant of the SI Project Headquarters, intended to work at the Defendant Company as the main consultant of the instant consulting project. However, the Plaintiff failed to work as the project as the main consultant of the instant consulting project because the Seoul Guarantee Insurance and U2S and the Defendant Company did not cooperate with their business. On June 2012, the process of proposing the instant project was conducted, the Plaintiff appeared at the Defendant Office, and was working until August of the same year, while the project was not carried out due to the non- cooperation with the G company, which was scheduled to be in charge, and was not put into the business of the instant project.

Meanwhile, H, the representative of the Defendant Company, is the Plaintiff’s KRW 2 million on May 31, 2012, and the same year.

7.24.10,000 won, and the same year.

8.25. 500,000 won, and the defendant company shall

7.4. 2 million won was remitted as salary. D.

On September 10, 2012, the Plaintiff transferred a company to I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “I”) and served as the head of the Information Security Business Department.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute between the parties, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. The Plaintiff’s summary of the parties’ assertion is the same month as April 3, 2012.