beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 700,000,000 and its KRW 500,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 700,000 from January 1, 2013, and KRW 200,00,000.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s instant subcontract execution 1) The Plaintiff is a domestic corporation established for the purpose of efficient construction, management, and operation of 14 airports across the nation, including Kimpo Airport. The Defendant, a domestic corporation, is a special purpose corporation established by NEMO Part nis SCG Inc. under the laws and regulations of Libya State. 2) On November 17, 2012, the tender promotion committee for the excessive government transport services of Libya entered into a contract with the Defendant on November 17, 2012 for the implementation of the project for the implementation of the passenger terminal and the implementation project for the temporary passenger terminal of Vietnaman airport and the mara airport passenger terminal (hereinafter “instant project”).
3) On December 26, 2012, with respect to the instant project with the Defendant, the Plaintiff: (a) based on the terminal design and the airport site consulting services for the Berne Airport and Muan Airport (hereinafter “consulting services”)
and ② Installation of ITs for airport operation and technical education services for related equipment (hereinafter referred to as “IT services”).
2) The subcontract agreement to which it provides (hereinafter referred to as the “instant subcontract”).
The main contents are as follows. The period of performing consulting services is from July 3, 2012 to December 24, 2012, 2012: (i) KRW 500 million from January 14 to December 15, 2013; (ii) KRW 2,679,000,000 from January 14, 2013 to December 15, 2013; and (iii) KRW 1,071,60,000 on December 31, 2012; (iv) the scope of the Plaintiff’s provision of consulting services shall not be construed as including the Plaintiff’s provision of consulting services on June 30, 2013; and (v) the scope of the Plaintiff’s provision of consulting services on January 15, 2014 [the scope of the Plaintiff’s provision of consulting services on the basis of natural disasters, war, quarantine, terrorism and other reasonable reasons; and (v) the scope of the agreement shall not be construed as including the Plaintiff’s liability for damages to third parties and third parties.