logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.17 2014가합22814
중재판정에 대한 집행판결
Text

1. As to the Korean Commercial Arbitration Claim No. 1312-0017 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board shall be regarded as the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board.

Reasons

1. The following facts of recognition are acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, as stated in Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 and 2:

A. The Plaintiff is an essential part-time company established for the purpose of providing consulting services related to the business ordered by the Cream Government.

B. In 2009, the Department of Cinistry of the Republic of Korea announced that it will implement a large-scale project called “B” to reconstruct the power generation facilities of B, and the Defendant, together with Hyundai Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Modern Engineering” and “Pngine Engine Co., Ltd.”), agreed to participate in the project in a consortium form, and entered into a consortium agreement around May 2010.

C. On July 12, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an exhibition agreement (Agency A; hereinafter “instant transfer agreement”) with the Defendant that, with respect to four projects (C, D, E, and F) ordered by C, the Department of C, E, and F, the Defendant shall pay 5% of the total amount of the contract to the Plaintiff, if the Defendant orders the project by his endeavor, in fee, if the Defendant orders the project.

In addition, the Hyundai Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "C Project") participated in the bidding for the main text of the C Project (hereinafter "C Project"), and entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on an increase in the amount that would have been divided into 50:50 if the final amount of receiving orders is increased compared to the minimum estimated amount of receiving orders from the Hyundai Engineering, the Defendant would have been awarded a subcontract from the Hyundai Engineering. On February 14, 2011, Hyundai Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "VIP consulting contract") made an oral agreement with the Plaintiff on an increase in the amount that would have been divided into 50:50,00 if the final amount of receiving orders is increased compared to the minimum estimated amount of receiving orders from the Plaintiff.

(e) it;

arrow