The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The confession of crime, the fact that there is any intention, the fact that there is no intention, the fact that there is a lot of penphones handled, and the distribution of penphones;

In light of the facts that there is no evidence to see, under favorable circumstances, there is a history of punishment several times for the same kind of crime, even though they were punished for repeated crimes due to the same kind of crime, they reached each of the crimes in this case without being well aware of the fact that they were committed, received, administered, possessed a scopon, and the quality of the crime is not easy by carrying the scopon, and the response to the training of scopon as a result of the scopon as a result of the scopic assessment, the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable, taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.