The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of crime, frequency of crime, method of crime, circumstances after crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the confession of the crime; (c) the volume of phiphones handled in large amounts; (d) the sales of phiphones cannot be arranged for profit-making; (c) the fact that an investigative agency actively cooperates with the investigation of narcotics-related criminal investigation; (d) the fact that the instant crime was committed without being aware of the suspension period of execution; (e) the distribution of phiphones by arranging the sales of phiphones; and (e) the fact that phiphones are reactioned to the training of phiphones as a result

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.