A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 4. 5. 00:57 경 안양시 동안구 C 2 층에 있는 ‘D 주점 ’에서, “ 손님이 깽판을 부린다” 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경기 안양동안경찰서 E 지구대 소속 경찰관 경위 F(52 세), 순경 G(34 세 )에게 욕설을 하고 시비를 걸었다.

Defendant 1 continued to pay the drinking value to the Defendant, and requested the Defendant to hand over the Defendant’s work to the Defendant and return home to the district, and then on the same day after his return to the district, 01:20 on the same day, and 01:20 on the same day after his return to the district.

“A police officer who was requested to return home from the above police officers who were called back after receiving the 112 report,” and “A police officer who was called up to the police station” was marked as the cell phone of the defendant;

The name has been called the ‘name to substitute', and the police officer has continued to do so, and it has been done in front of the singinging building where the police officer requested to return home and the defective patrol car was parked to return home.

At this place, the Defendant opened the front door of the patrol vehicle in order for police officers to get aboard the patrol vehicle and opened two times, obstructed the patrol vehicle in front of the patrol vehicle and marked the number plate of the patrol vehicle by their own telephone, etc., and subsequently, the police officers used the patrol vehicle to prevent the police officers from proceeding between about 30 minutes, such as blocking the police officers from getting on and off the patrol vehicle and leaving the patrol vehicle, thereby blocking the police officers from leaving the seat of the patrol vehicle in front of 50 meters, and preventing him/her from going on and leaving the patrol vehicle, and preventing him/her from getting on and leaving the patrol vehicle. As such, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, and maintenance of order of the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Each statement of H, I, and J;

1. Mobile phone images and black fluor photographs;

1. A report on internal investigation (on-site conditions, etc.);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (cinematographic materials taken at the time of dispatch to the scene);

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;