logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.17 2018구합36
견책처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is a police officer appointed as a policeman on April 18, 1987.

On December 31, 1992, the Plaintiff promoted to a slope on March 1, 2001, respectively, and promoted to a B police station and a traffic safety system on September 1, 2009. From February 1, 2012, the Plaintiff served in B police station life safety and CCTV control center from July 12, 2016.

B. On October 2, 2016, the Plaintiff posted a notice stating the following on the bulletin board of the National Police Agency’s internal Internet network of the National Police Agency.

A person who was pointed out by the Plaintiff as a captain of the so-called ‘A' in this article was a reduction C, which was a traffic and traffic safety guidance at the time of the B police station.

The non-human nature of the improvement of organized culture must be eradicated.

1. In spite of the fact that there is a chief of the division of traffic, the authority to pay a fine for negligence is still drinking and net, using the position of the chief of the division of reduction.

2. The escape of most employees to other departments due to personal treatment of employees.

3. Illegal claims against overtime work allowances. A simple warning measure against the principle of equity, even though the duty allowances are recovered;

4. Preparation and placement of work place, etc. in mind, disregarding the instruction of his superior;

5. 빽을 근거로 내년에도 남아서 근무한다며 직원들에게 심적 부담

6. Organizational culture, such as personnel affairs, shall be eradicated and combined;

C. The plaintiff's status B

Due to the publication of the statement in paragraph C, the hearing investigation was conducted with respect to C, and in the process C filed a petition against the Plaintiff, the inspection and investigation was also conducted with respect to the Plaintiff.

On May 25, 2017, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Provincial Police Agency Hearing and audit office prepared a survey report stating that "the plaintiff has obstructed organizing compatibility by taking a bath and insulting behavior against C, who is his/her superior, etc." and reported it to the defendant.

Police officers shall have all relevant Acts and subordinate statutes.

arrow