logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017. 03. 22. 선고 2016누63561 판결
국민주택단지내 토지조성용역은 면세되는 국민주택건설용역에 해당되지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Incheon District Court-2015-Gu Partnership-50188 (Law No. 11, 2016)

Title

land preparation services within a national housing complex shall not constitute national housing construction services exempt from taxation;

Summary

Article 106 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act provides for the exemption of value-added tax as the "construction services of national housing", such provision shall be deemed only the construction services of national housing itself, and it shall not be deemed that the construction of national housing, etc. independently progress prior to the construction of national housing, etc. is included in the infrastructure construction works for the entire housing area.

Related statutes

Article 12 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act Article 106 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2016Nu63561 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff and appellant

O-company corporation

Defendant, Appellant

OO Head of the tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Incheon District Court Decision 2015Guhap50188 Decided August 11, 2016

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 15, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

March 22, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's imposition of value-added tax of KRW 69,930,825 on April 7, 2014 against the plaintiff, and the imposition of value-added tax of KRW 382,886,602 on July 1, 2014 against the plaintiff shall be revoked, respectively.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, and Article 8(2) of the Civil Procedure Act, on the grounds of this Court’s judgment.

It shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Private Litigation Act.

2. Conclusion

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow