logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017. 01. 17. 선고 2016누63547 판결
국민주택단지내 토지조성용역은 면세되는 국민주택건설용역에 해당되지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Incheon District Court-2014-Gu Partnership-32589 (Law No. 11, 2016)

Title

land preparation services within a national housing complex shall not constitute national housing construction services exempt from taxation;

Summary

Article 106 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act provides for the exemption of value-added tax as the "construction services of national housing", such provision shall be deemed only the construction services of national housing itself, and it shall not be deemed that the construction of national housing, etc. independently progress prior to the construction of national housing, etc. is included in the infrastructure construction works for the entire housing area.

Related statutes

Article 12 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act Article 106 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2016Nu63547 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff and appellant

O-company corporation

Defendant, Appellant

OO Head of the tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Incheon District Court Decision 2014Guhap32589 Decided August 11, 2016

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 29, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

January 17, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The imposition of value-added tax for the second period of 208 against the Plaintiff on January 3, 2014 by the Defendant shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) the same is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of “(2016du50594, Dec. 15, 2016)” in the following, and thus, the same is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow