logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.6.11. 선고 2014누12398 판결
부정수급액징수금결정취소
Cases

2014Nu12398. Revocation of the determination of illegally received amount to be collected;

Plaintiff Appellant

A

Defendant Elives

Daejeon Head of Local Employment and Labor Agency

The first instance judgment

Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Guhap2671 Decided November 12, 2014

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 23, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

June 11, 2015

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the disposition of imposition of KRW 9,600,000 against the plaintiff on August 7, 2013.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge shall receive the award of merit;

Judges Kim Gin-jin

Judges, Superintendent of the National Assembly

arrow