logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2011.7.7. 선고 2011누189 판결
취업기간만료자취업활동기간연장불허가처분취소
Cases

2011Nu189 Revocation of revocation of refusal to extend the employment activity period for a person whose employment expires.

Plaintiff Appellant

A

Defendant Elives

Daejeon Head of Local Employment and Labor Agency

The first instance judgment

Daejeon District Court Decision 2010Guhap2038 Decided January 12, 2011

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 26, 2011

Imposition of Judgment

July 7, 2011

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's rejection of the extension of the employment period for the plaintiff on May 11, 2010 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge, new judge

Judges Cho Young-hoon

Judges Kim Gung-sung

arrow