Cases
2011Nu189 Revocation of revocation of refusal to extend the employment activity period for a person whose employment expires.
Plaintiff Appellant
A
Defendant Elives
Daejeon Head of Local Employment and Labor Agency
The first instance judgment
Daejeon District Court Decision 2010Guhap2038 Decided January 12, 2011
Conclusion of Pleadings
May 26, 2011
Imposition of Judgment
July 7, 2011
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's rejection of the extension of the employment period for the plaintiff on May 11, 2010 shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges
The presiding judge, new judge
Judges Cho Young-hoon
Judges Kim Gung-sung