logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 01. 12. 선고 2016두57991 판결
(심리불속행) 검인계약서외에 별도로 작성된 매매계약서가 존재하지 않은 이상 검인계약서는 실제 매매계약서에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court 2016Nu20081 ( October 21, 2016)

Title

(In addition to the seal of approval agreement, if there is no separate sales contract, the seal of approval agreement constitutes the actual sales contract.

Summary

It is reasonable to dispose of the seal of approval contract by viewing it as an actual contract, such as that it is difficult to see that the seal of approval contract was falsely prepared or forged, and the validity of the seal of approval contract is not denied only by the statement of the broker.

Related statutes

Article 96 of the Income Tax Act, and the necessary expenses for capital gains under Article 97.

Cases

2016Du5791 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2016Nu20081 Decided October 21, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and it is therefore dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow