logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1982. 11. 9. 선고 82도1256 판결
[명예훼손][집30(4)형,4;공1983.1.15.(696)129]
Main Issues

The crime of publicly alleging false facts and defamation that may identify a victim by taking full account of the surrounding circumstances is established.

Summary of Judgment

The crime of defamation does not necessarily require a person’s name to be explicitly indicated, and thus, if the expression of false facts without a person’s name can be identified by comprehensively determining the contents of the expression in light of the surrounding circumstances, it constitutes defamation against the specific person.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney Kim Young-young

Judgment of the lower court

Busan District Court Decision 82No258 delivered on April 22, 1982

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The defendant's defense counsel's grounds of appeal are examined.

In order to establish the crime of defamation under Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act, the victim's act of publicly alleging false facts is identical to the novels, but since the statement of false facts without a person's name is not necessarily required to explicitly indicate false facts, if it is possible to judge the contents of the expression in light of the surrounding circumstances and comprehensively, whether it is a certain person, it constitutes defamation against the specific person. As legally determined by the court below, there has been disputes over the management of the clan properties between the non-indicted and the defendant, and 50 households among the 80 generation of new clans, and 50 households among the 80 generation of new clans, "if any of the branch members embezzled the clan properties" of the defendant's broadcasting, it is sufficient to view that it was a situation where at least a certain molecule is the non-indicted among the members of new clans who listened to the defendant's false facts, and therefore, it cannot be viewed that the defendant's act was a defamation of the non-indicted, and therefore, it cannot be viewed as unlawful by social norms.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Yoon Il-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-부산지방법원 1982.4.22.선고 82노258
본문참조조문
기타문서