The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the victim D and the family members of the "C" clan.

On September 8, 2013, the Defendant, at around 10:00, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts by using a small banner stating “Ign, from among the doors that the prime walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk.”

B. On September 15, 2013, the Defendant, at around 10:00, damaged the victim’s reputation by using a small banner stating that “The head of the Dong shall collect a street from his property, and the head of the Dong shall be deducted together, so that the head of the Dong may bring about a fluent life between the head of the Gu and the head of the Gu.”

C. On September 15, 2013, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts in the same way as the above paragraph (a), using a small banner with the content that “The head of the H kindergarten located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 15, 2013,” stating that “The head of the Gu shall collect flag in the door of his/her property and take away his/her wife shape together, so that the head of the Gu may flag with the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head

2. Determination

A. The crime of defamation does not necessarily require a person’s name to be explicitly indicated, and thus, in a case where the expression of false facts without a person’s name can be identified in light of the surrounding circumstances and the contents of the expression, it constitutes defamation against the specific person.

B. (See, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 82Do1256, Nov. 9, 1982).