The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is between the victim C (36 years of age, women) and son.

On May 11, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as talking at a different place and dissiping the victim’s arms at the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Asan 79-ro 79-ro, Samsung 104-dong 104-dong 104, which caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as a string, a string, a defective string, and a dissipling the victim’s arms.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court: ① the Defendant appears to have committed an act, such as moving the victim’s arms to another person and turning the victim’s arms into the victim’s arms in order to talk about the victim’s personal affairs at a large number of people, including her children, on the ground that the injured person was drinking the Defendant’s personal affairs on the ground that her children was not able to drink; ② the Defendant’s act was a relatively minor act that was relatively minor at the level that the victim’s hand or the arms were caught by the victim’s hand or the shoulder part was cut down; ③ the victim’s act was merely a relatively minor act in the investigative agency except that the Defendant was towed by the victim’s arms.

I cannot answer the question “.....”.

In light of the situation at which the Defendant was admitted by evidence and the specific content and degree of the type of force of the Defendant’s exercise of rights, in light of the victim’s legal statement, such as the victim’s statement that “the Defendant her shouldered with his/her arms, her shouldered with his/her arms, her shouldered with his/her arms,” etc., the victim’s legal statement is difficult to believe it as is.