logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.13 2016고정370
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 High 370] On November 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) considered that the victim B (the 50-year age), while driving his/her own vehicle, experienced difficulties in traffic due to the opposite side relationship with the vehicle coming from the opposite side on a narrow road while driving his/her vehicle on the road front of Samsung C&M apartment located in the 50-ro, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si; (b) led the victim to drive the vehicle; and (c) led the victim to drive the vehicle; (d) whether the victim’s vehicle is unable to drive the vehicle immediately because the victim is driving around the other party on the ground that he/she is not a person who is able to see, e.g., the victim’s vehicle while driving along the surrounding area.

It was a great lux, such as “.......”

Since then, the Defendant reported the victim 112 and called to the scene D, police officers belonging to the Suwon Police Station C, and police officers belonging to the Suwon Police Station C, and received statements by dividing the Defendant and the victim into the site and listening to the statements, the Defendant: “I am on the part of the Defendant during this year, I am for the same year, I am for the same year, I am for the same year, I am for the same ward, I am for this year;

In addition, A.I. L. L.S. L.C.

Does the driving be done on the basis of its degree;

In addition, the victim openly insultingd the victim by taking a large interest, such as “Is that the occurrence may not occur.”

[2016 High 399] The Defendant served as a shop in G “G” operated by the Victim F from July 2014 to September 1, 2014.

Despite the fact that all of the transaction partners of the above G from the end of August 2014 to the end of September 2014, 2014 did not have engaged in the seizure of claims against G or caused enormous damage to the transaction partner by G, the Defendant is holding a seizure of claims from all the transaction partners supplying goods to G, including H business employees I of the H business office, and K of J employees, which are G’s business partners.

If we do not participate, it is difficult to recover the outstanding amount.

(d) They do not deduct or more deal with goods. G. They are different from what they can be consumed in G.

arrow