logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고단298
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 60,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 30,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the Cwning and Ⅲ freezing vehicle in violation of signal from the blind distance of the public health clinic located in the city of Jeju on February 13, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field medication;

1. Article 156 of the relevant Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the claim is that the Defendant entered the public health clinic shooting range at the green light, but the Defendant’s red light started when the Defendant’s vehicle at the front side did not pass through the said intersection while the vehicle at the front side did not pass through the said intersection. The Defendant does not enter the red light into the said intersection.

2. The judgment of this court is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this court: (i) the public health clinic distance located at the Jeju-si, the site of this case, at the Jeju-si, is a system in which the signals in both direction and opposite direction are visible simultaneously to both directions, and the signal to turn to the left after yellow light; (ii) the control police officers controlling vehicles in the above public health clinic shooting distance, who discovered signal-violation vehicles in front of the crosswalk on the front side of the signal apparatus at the public health clinic shooting distance, and discovered the signal-violation vehicle at the front side of the rear bank, thereby controlling the signal-violation vehicle at the direction of the Defendant; (iii) the police officers in charge of controlling the signal-violation vehicle at the direction of the signal apparatus at the lower side of the signal apparatus at the public health clinic; and (iv) the police officers in charge of controlling the signal-violation vehicle at the direct direction after checking the signal signal.

arrow