Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 25,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2020, the Defendant, at around 18:00, committed a violation of the signal in a children protection zone by running the red light above the stop line in the front door of C elementary school located in C at the time of harmony.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant asserts that part of the Defendant’s legal statement, namely, on-site guidance pictures, screen pictures, and motion picture CDs, the Defendant did not violate the signal given that the red light does not exceed the stop line.

In light of the above evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the defendant was found to have driven over the stop line immediately after the red light was changed from the yellow light. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

In addition, even based on the Defendant’s assertion and the video CD, which is the evidence adopted and investigated by this court, the fact that the Defendant was running beyond the stop line after being changed into the yellow light is apparent, and therefore, if the signal is in compliance with the relevant provisions, such as Article 5 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 6 of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act, and attached Table 2, if the signal is yellow light, the meaning of the signal is a yellow light, “if there is a stop line or a crosswalk, the vehicle or horse must be stopped immediately before it or at the intersection,” and the above behavior of the Defendant clearly violates the signal.

Therefore, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 156 of the relevant Act and Articles 156 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.