The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (a fine of KRW 5 million, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant did not have the same criminal record, there is no social harm to the crime of this case that harms the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and thus requires punishment corresponding thereto, there is a need for doubt as to whether the defendant confessions the crime of this case at the investigative agency and the court below. However, there is a need for doubt as to whether the crime of this case is seriously against his own crime due to his absence at all on the date of the trial, even though the crime of this case is committed, it seems that the basic compliance consciousness has been weak due to the three times punishment, the suspension of execution one time, and multiple criminal records, which are related to the crime of this case, and other matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc. as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence against

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.