The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. On the other hand, the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case and reflects it is favorable for him to do so.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women’s sex; (b) it is necessary to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and establish a sound sexual culture; (c) the Defendant may have the record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the repeated offense period; (c) the Defendant was absent on the date of trial during the original trial; and (d) other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age and happiness environment; and (e) the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.