The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (a prison term of six months, a suspended sentence of two years, a community service and confiscation of 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant did not have the same criminal record and has no history of having been sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, there is no social harm to the crime of this case that harms the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the women's sex, and requires strict punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, the size of the defendant's sexual traffic establishments is not small, the defendant's attitude to be in the judgment of this case, and other matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, are considered in light of the records and arguments of this case, it is not unreasonable for the court below's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.