The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's criminal act through detention for not less than three months, and there are circumstances such as closing the business of sexual traffic after the crime of this case. However, since the social harm of the crime of this case that harms the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, it is necessary to punish the defendant accordingly. The defendant engages in arranging sexual traffic for business at the same place without being aware of it during the suspension period of execution of the same kind of crime even though he had three previous crimes of the same kind, and taking into account other various matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, the punishment of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.