logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.03.27 2013고합1425
뇌물수수
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of six months and fine of three million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of four months.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On February 1, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the offer of bribe, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of private documents at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on June 18, 2013.

1. Defendant A worked with the Seocho-gu Office F from January 22, 2005 to August 20, 2010, and was in charge of the administrative affairs with the Seocho-gu Office F from July 1, 2008 to August 20, 2010, Defendant A supplied various goods related to the exercise of KRW 93,864,30 on 14 occasions from around January 13, 201 to around August 201, and on June 29, 2008 (the facts charged are indicated as October 24, 2008. However, inasmuch as the supply contract between Seocho-gu Office and Defendant B was concluded on 14 occasions on June 29, 2008 between Defendant A and the Seocho-gu Office, the Seocho-gu Office supplied various goods related to the exercise of KRW 143,864,300 from around January 13, 2010.

Defendant

A around July 24, 2008, at the same time, received 1.6 million won from Defendant B to Defendant B’s new bank account (Account Number J) in the name of Defendant B used by Defendant B from July 24, 2008 and received a bribe in connection with his duties after receiving a total of 7.1.6 million won from the time of the transfer from July 29, 2010 to June 29, 2010.

2. Defendant B, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), remitted a total of 7,160,000 won from July 24, 2008 to June 29, 2010, and offered a bribe in relation to the public official’s duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The second written statement of the suspect examination protocol prepared by the prosecution against the defendant B (including the part concerning the defendant A's substitute);

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding H;

1. The investigation report is the suspect B B H account.

arrow