beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In January of 2005, the defendant entered the E Limited Company located in Haan-gun, Hanam-gun, and worked as FT Co., Ltd., while working as FCo., the defendant has overall control over the affairs such as requesting testing and analysis to an authorized agency and submitting the test report received from an authorized agency to Samsung T&C Co., Ltd., which is the main trading company, for Samsung T&C Co., Ltd., and gas diskettes used as parts of Samsung 200 Ka 200 Ka.
1. Around April 2008, the Defendant altered private documents: (a) instead of having undergone quality inspections at the Korea Chemical Testing Research Institute at the above E-liability Company Office, the Defendant contained the previous test report in the name of the Korea Chemical Testing Research Institute, such as the President of the Korea Chemical Testing Research Institute, etc., for the purpose of exercising the right as shown in the attached list of crimes (1) from that time to August 2013, 200, and subsequently altered five copies of the test report in the name of the Korea Chemical Testing Research Institute, etc., which is a private document related to the certification of facts, by using a computer program called “42.5” to “42.5” in the seal strength of the previous storage.
2. Around April 2008, the Defendant, at the above E-liability Company Office, failed to undergo or pass a quality inspection at an authorized agency. However, the Defendant submitted the altered test report as described in Paragraph 1 while undergoing a quality inspection on the failure of the victim 20DTS Company. From April 2008 to August 2013, the Defendant exercised the results of the alteration on a total of 102 occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table (2) and interfered with the quality inspection work of the victims by fraudulent means.
3. On May 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim 20DTS Co., Ltd. in the same manner as described in paragraph 2 at the above E Limited Quality Group Office, was awarded the pass decision by the victim 2.