A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant became a member of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) located in Ansan-si, Sinsan-si (hereinafter “E”) around 200, and from January 2006 to January 2006, the Defendant is a person in charge of performing the duties of requesting testing and analysis to an authorized agency and submitting a test report received from an authorized agency to F with respect to 21 electric vehicles, which are parts of K21 vehicles, who work as the quality control team leader of the above company from January 2006.

1. Around April 15, 2010, the Defendant forged private documents and altered private documents in E offices, using a computer program called “shot board,” in which the results of the existing issuance of the test are contained, and forged the above test report (TAS-038045) which is a private document stating the name of sample, the date of receipt, the date of completion of the test, the date of issuance, and the date of publication at will. From that time to September 15, 2013, the Defendant forged and altered 24 copies of the test report in the name of the president of the Korea Chemical Convergence Research Institute, which is a private document, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

2. Around April 30, 2010, the Defendant submitted a forged test report to F, as seen above, at E office around April 30, 2010, and exercised a total of 27 times from that time to September 16, 2013 as stated in the list of crimes.

3. Around April 30, 2010, the Defendant submitted the forged test report to the victim F and had the victim supply parts to the victim F and receive 26,080,000 won from the victim E. From that time to September 16, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 225,62,100,00 from the victim F, etc. as stated in the attached crime list from that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the evidence list Nos. 1 to 4, 6 to 14 statutes submitted by the prosecutor

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 347(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), and Article 231 of the Criminal Act for the selection of criminal facts;