logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.11.14. 선고 2012누10262 판결
직업능력개발훈련비반환명령취소
Cases

2012Nu102. Revocation of an order to refund workplace skill development training fees

Plaintiff-Appellant

A Stock Company

Defendant Appellant

The head of the following mountainous districts of the Gwangju Regional Employment and Labor Office

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 201Guhap37435 decided March 22, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 14, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

November 14, 2013

Text

1. Revocation of the judgment of the first instance, and the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed;

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s order to return training costs of KRW 3,385,943 against the Plaintiff on August 16, 2011 shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

Judgment ex officio is made.

If an administrative disposition is revoked, such disposition becomes void and no longer exists, and a revocation lawsuit against a non-existent administrative disposition is unlawful as there is no benefit of lawsuit (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Du15343, Oct. 13, 201).

The record reveals the fact that the Defendant revoked the instant disposition ex officio on September 26, 2013, which was subsequent to the filing of the instant appeal.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the lawsuit in this case is dismissed, and the total cost is borne by the Defendants under Article 32 of the Administrative Litigation Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Judges

The presiding judge, public judge and senior judge;

Judges, Appointment and Civility

Judges Cho Jong-sung

arrow