2012Nu19467. Revocation of a restriction on payment of costs, etc.

A Stock Company

The Head of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul Gangnam District Office

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap1693 decided June 1, 2012

November 14, 2013

November 14, 2013

1. Revocation of the judgment of the first instance, and the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed;

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s restriction on the payment of expenses from October 22, 2008 to October 21, 2009 against the Plaintiff on October 18, 201, and orders the return of KRW 17,702,710 as a result, and the disposition of the site payment for training expenses against the Plaintiff on December 20, 201 and the disposition of the site payment for training expenses against the Plaintiff on January 11, 2012 shall be revoked, respectively.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Judgment ex officio is made.

If an administrative disposition is revoked, such disposition becomes void and no longer exists, and a revocation lawsuit against a non-existent administrative disposition is unlawful as there is no benefit of lawsuit (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Du15343, Oct. 13, 201).

The record reveals the fact that the defendant revoked the dispositions of this case on October 21, 2013, which was after filing the appeal of this case, ex officio.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the total cost of the lawsuit is borne by the defendant pursuant to Article 32 of the Administrative Litigation Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

The presiding judge, public judge and senior judge;

Judges, Appointment and Civility

Judges Cho Jong-sung