1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months;

2. However, the above sentence against Defendant A for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A In the frequency operated by the Defendant around 03:00 on May 5, 2015, at the same time, he listens to a conversation between the Defendant and the Defendant’s wife and the Victim B (Woo 26 years of age) who is the same as that of the Defendant’s wife and is in conflict with the Defendant’s wife. The Defendant “I know the nature of the Defendant, know it, you can see it, and what male will be good.”

"Along with the victim, the victim was punished for a conflict with the victim, and the victim and the telephone re-convened with the victim, and the victim was found to be the house of No. 707 of the building in the Hanam-si where the victim was the victim at around 04:00 on the same day, and caused the victim's face several times, such as the victim's walking away from the bed, the victim's breast part of the breast part in the bed part, and the victim's head was faced with the victim's chest part in the toilet change for about 28 days, and caused the victim's injury, such as the victim's head was suffering from about 28 days in the form of a diveal coordinate and the left part of the bar.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

2. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against B or D;

3. Each written diagnosis;

4. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the parts of the wife B of the person under consideration.

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

3. The part not guilty (Defendant B) of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation;

1. The summary of the facts charged is the date and time and place indicated in the facts charged as indicated in the judgment, and as a result, the Defendant took the face of A several times with the floor of hand, and put up a light, a shoulder, a shoulder, a arms part, etc. in need of treatment for about 14 days to A.

2. In full view of the evidence submitted, including the police interrogation protocol (94 pages of the investigation record) and the photo (69 pages) of the upper body of A, as indicated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant mentioned above the defendant's hand and resistance against the defendant, and thereby, the defendant's injury was caused to the plaintiff's neck and shoulder.